11.2.2 The Downward Spiral
You could forgive someone for thinking that the Bible is written in a
way which almost invites us to misinterpret it. I can recall many a doctrinal
conversation with the likes of Jehovah's Witnesses, in which I've tried
to show them that their idiosyncratic view of, e.g. the 144,000 or the
status of the Watchtower magazine, just isn't supported in the
Bible as they think it is. At the end, I want to say: 'Yes, I know that's
what it seems to you, I agree; but the general teaching of the Bible,
under the surface, is quite the opposite. But until you give
your heart to wanting to find God's truth, that's how you'll
always see it'. The superficial Bible reader will be deceived by God's
word into believing things which are a false Gospel; a system of understanding
which has an appearance of the Gospel, but which is actually
an anti-Gospel (cp. 2 Cor. 11:4; Gal. 1:6). The fact that so many apparently
sincere Bible readers are so wrong shows that there is a power of delusion
at work greater than those people just making a few mistakes in their
Bible exposition. The super-human power of deceit which is at work is
from God. The hobbyists, the part-timers, those who in their hearts
are not wholeheartedly committed to God's Truth, are deceived.
General Principles
God works both positively and negatively. We are perhaps more familiar
with the Bible teaching that God will confirm men in their efforts to
be spiritual by the work of His Holy Spirit; but we perhaps shy away from
the fact that the opposite process also operates in the lives and minds
of those who have turned away from God's Truth. It is evident that God
does not force us to be righteous or evil in a robot-like sense. And yet
it is also evident that if our salvation was purely by making the 'right'
decisions and behaviour using our unaided freewill, then salvation (if
ever we got it) would be by works and the steeling of human will power,
rather than by God's gracious working in us through His Son.
As a synthesis of all this, it seems that God expects men to make freewill
decisions, which He then confirms. Those who turn from Him and put His
word into second place in their lives are confirmed in this, until they
are progressively caught up in a downward spiral of declension. On the
other hand, those who try to be lead by God's word are progressively lead
ever higher in an upward spiral of spirituality, whereby God eases the
way to obedience, shields them from temptation, and opens their minds
to the Truth of His word (e.g. 2 Chron. 30:12; Ps. 119:173; Prov. 16:3;
2 Thess. 2:17). I have extensively discussed this issue elsewhere (48).
The antithesis to all this is what I now want to talk about: the way in
which God will make obedience more difficult and cloud men's understanding
of His Truth. It is possible that God will lead us into the way of temptation
(as He did Adam), even though the process of temptation is internal to
our mind (James 1:13-15). Surely the Lord had this in mind when he bade
us pray: " Lead us not into temptation (down the downward
spiral) but deliver us..." (Mt. 6:13). Jonah is a classic
example of a man slipping into the downward spiral- he goes down to
Joppa, down into the ship, down into the very bottom
of the ship, and finally down into the depths of the sea (Jonah
1). Sin, but its very nature, leads to more sin- e.g. adultery is a fire,
once committed it tends to burn ever more fiercely to a man’s destruction
(Job 31:12).
Confirmation In Sin
There are times when God has influenced men not to respond to the evidently
wise words of other men, in order to fulfill His purpose (e.g. 1 Kings
12:15; 2 Chron. 25:20). Take Amaziah. A prophet warned him not to pursue
a certain course of action- but commented: “But if thou wilt go, do it,
be strong…God shall make thee fall” (2 Chron. 25:8). God was willing to
confirm and even encourage Amaziah in a wrong way- if this was Amaziah’s
choice. Therefore God has the power to influence the minds of men in this
way, and He uses it. " He taketh away the heart of the chief of the
people, and causeth them to wander" (Job 12:24 cp. 42:7). And God
uses this ability to make men refuse to respond to the evident Truth of
His word (e.g. 1 Sam. 2:25). Yet in all this, God is only confirming
men in the path they chose to tread. The very experience of sin confirms
sinners in that way: “the way of the wicked seduceth them” (Prov. 12:26).
The more men sin, the more sin God counts to them, even if they may not
have actually committed it. Thus Lk. 11:50 warns the first century Jews
that the guilt of killing all the Old Testament prophets would
come upon them when they killed Christ- even though they themselves hadn't
killed them. This was prophesied centuries before: " Add iniquity
unto their iniquity; and let them not come into thy (imputed) righteousness"
(Ps. 69:27). In the same way as God will add sin to the sinner's sin,
so He will add His gift of imputed righteousness to the man who at least
tries to be righteous. It was through this principle that God could count
Abraham as if he had actual sacrificed Isaac, even though Abraham didn't
physically do it. He was willing to do it, and this was counted as if
he had done it. And the reverse is also true. The concept of imputed sin
is to be found again in Rev. 18:24, where we read that ‘Babylon’ is made
guilty of the blood of all the saints who had ever been slain- the guilt
of their deaths is imputed to her.
The changeover from the downward spiral to the upward spiral ought to
have begun at baptism; but as with some of the Roman believers in the
first century, a believer can slip back into the downward spiral: "
Just as you used to offer the parts of your body in slavery to impurity
and to ever increasing wickedness, so now offer them in slavery
to righteousness leading to holiness" (Rom. 6:19 NIV). The life of
sexual impurity is an " ever increasing" downwards path; the
endless quest for new relationships and sexual novelty doesn't need to
be described. It is significant that having " left the natural use
of the woman" (Rom. 1:27), male homosexuals descend on an "
ever increasing" path of perversion; they rarely remain where they
are, in moral terms. At least two independent surveys of gay men found
that around 20% admitted having sex with animals, compared to 3% of heterosexual
man (49). The majority of homosexuals have
literally thousands of encounters over a lifetime (hence the rapid spread
of disease between them), with very few developing stable relationships
(50). There is also well documented connection between
homosexuality and masochism. The top six male serial killers in the US
were all gay; as were many Nazi concentration camp operators. The same
connection is also witnessed Biblically (Gen. 19:6-8; Jud. 19:16).
The principle of the downward spiral is true on a racial level as well
as a personal one. As human history goes on, it is inevitable that man's
perversion both of himself and of God's word will get progressively worse.
It is for this reason, I suggest, that we now have widespread pressure
to accept homosexuality as acceptable behaviour for Christians- pressure
which comes from people who genuinely believe that they are reflecting
the will of God as expressed in the Bible. Their sincerity is not at question;
but evidently they are willing victims of the downward spiral of declension
which Paul recognized 2000 years ago.
Paul expressed his concept of this 'upward' and 'downward' spiral in
two words: " the spirit" and " the flesh" . "
Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfill the lust of the flesh (this
doesn't mean the Spiritual believer won't sin; but he won't be on the
downward spiral at the same time as he's on the upward spiral). For (in
some of the early believers in Galatia) the flesh lusteth against the
Spirit...and these are contrary the one to the other: so that ye (weak
believers) cannot do the things that ye would (this isn't a sympathetic
lament from Paul, because of what follows:). But if ye be led of the Spirit,
ye are not under the law...they that are Christ's have crucified the flesh
with the affections and lusts (i.e. they shouldn't have been experiencing
the " lust" between the flesh and spirit which they were). If
we live in the Spirit, let us also walk (live each moment) in the Spirit"
(Gal. 5:16-25). It is apparent that in the early church, there were those
who had slid back from the upward spiral (life in " the Spirit"
) to the downward spiral of " the flesh" . The tragedy is that
mainstream Christianity today has so morally retreated that it effectively
teaches that the way of " the flesh" , this downward spiral
of justifying sexual immorality as acceptable, is in fact the way of the
" Spirit" , in that they believe that their newfound moral 'freedom'
is part of a more mature spiritual level which they have reached.
The Deceptive God
God does not just disregard those who turn away from Him. He deceives
them, and leads them into a downward spiral of moral and doctrinal declension.
The idea of " the God of Truth" deceiving people may seem strange
at first. But consider the following evidence:
- God deceived prophets to speak things in His Name which were actually
false (1 Kings 22:20-22; Ez. 14:9). He chose Israel's delusions by making
their idols answer them (Is. 66:3,4). He laid a stumbling block before
the righteous man who turned to sin (Ez. 3:20), driving him along "
slippery ways in the darkness: they shall be driven on, and fall therein:
for I will bring evil upon them" (Jer. 23:12). Jeremiah
feared God had deceived him (Jer. 20:7)- showing he knew such
a thing was possible. Dt. 13:1-3 warns Israel not to believe prophets
whose prophecies came true although they taught false doctrines, because
they may have been raised up to test their obedience. God deceived Israel
by telling them about the peace which would come on Jerusalem in the
future Kingdom; they didn't consider the other prophecies which
were given at the same time concerning their imminent judgment,
and therefore they thought that God was pleased with them and was about
to establish the Messianic Kingdom; when actually the very opposite
was about to happen (Jer. 4:10).
- The foolish heart of Israel was darkened / blinded, the Greek implies
(Rom. 1:21). God gave them a mind which wanted to practice homosexuality
and lesbianism (v.28), and therefore they received a recompense appropriate
to the delusion which they had been given (v. 27 Gk.) . Note that their
punishment was to be given and encouraged in homosexual tendencies (diseases
like AIDS are the result of upsetting nature's balance rather than the
recompense spoken of in Romans 1). Christian men in the first century
gave themselves over to sexual immorality (Eph. 4:19), and
therefore God " gave them over to a reprobate mind" (Rom.
1:24,26,28). “Blind yourselves and be blind”, God angrily remonstrated
with Israel; yet God had closed their eyes, confirming them in the decision
for blindness which they had taken themselves (Is. 29:9,10 RVmg.).
- The Lord spoke in parables so that Israel would be deceived
and therefore would not come to salvation (Mk. 4:12; Lk. 8:10
cp. Acts 28:26). Prov. 26:7 likens "a parable in the mouth
of fools" to a lame man unable to walk; parables disable
the progress of those who don't wish to understand them. This
fact is hard to get round for those who feel God isn't
responsible for deception. Isaiah spoke likewise (Is. 6:9,10;
29:10,11). The Angels will work in such a way as to allow the
world to be deceived at the end of the Millennium (Rev. 20:3,8).
- The apostate among God's people, both in Old and New Testaments,
sunk to the most unbelievable levels, but sincerely felt that they were
doing God's will. These things included killing righteous prophets (Jn.
16:2), turning the breaking of bread service into a drunken orgy (1
Cor. 11:21), and turning prostitution within the ecclesia into a spiritual
act (Rev. 2:20). For believers to come to the conclusion that such things
were the will of God surely they were not just misinterpreting Scripture.
There was an extra-human power of delusion at work. We have seen in
the above verses that God is responsible for this kind of thing.
Note that the Bible knows nothing of a super-human devil who does all
this.
- 2 Thess. 2:9-11 is the classic proof. God plagued the first century
ecclesia with false brethren who could work impressive miracles; because
" they received not the love of the truth (they treated it as a
hobby)...God shall send them strong delusion, that they might believe
a lie" . God deceived brethren in the run up to AD70- it's that
plain. And the events of AD70 are typical of our last days.
- 2 Thess. 2 has many connections with the Olivet Prophecy. The idea
of believers being deceived at the time of Christ's " coming"
connects with Mt. 24:5,11,24 describing 'the majority' (Gk.) of the
latter day church being " deceived" . 2 Thess. 2:11 says that
this deception is sent by God because they refuse to love the Truth.
The conclusion is hard to avoid: in our last days, the majority of believers
will be deceived because we don't " love the truth" - it's
no more than a hobby.
- God “enticed” [RVmg. “deceived”] Ahab (2 Chron. 18:19).
- God worked false miracles at the time of AD70, according to 2 Thess.
2:9-11. This means that the 'miracles' claimed by Pentecostals and the
like may be actual miracles; God allows them to be done because He wishes
to deceive such people.
Case studies
Pharaoh hardened his own heart (Ex. 7:22; 8:15,19,32;
9:7,34,35). And yet God hardened his heart (Ex. 9:12; 10:1,20,27; 11:10;
14:8). The references to God hardening Pharaoh's heart generally occur
after Pharaoh had first hardened his own heart. The fact Pharaoh
hardened his heart was a sin (Ex. 9:34), and yet God encouraged him in
this. God offered Pharaoh a way of escape after each of the plagues; all
he had to do was to agree to let Israel go. But the conditions got tougher
the longer he resisted God's demand: he finally had to not only let Israel
go, but also provide them with sacrifices (Ex. 10:25). Likewise when Nebuchadnezzar
lifted his heart up, God hardened it (Dan. 5:20).
Shimei was a wicked man who hated God's servant David.
God told him to curse David (2 Sam. 16:10). Afterwards, Shimei repents
and acknowledges that by doing so he sinned (2 Sam. 19:20). And although
David recognized that God had told Shimei to curse him (2 Sam. 16:10),
David tells Solomon not to hold Shimei " guiltless" for how
he had cursed him (1 Kings 2:9). Again, a man is encouraged by God to
do the sinful act in which he has set his heart.
Balaam was one of God's prophets. Balak, an enemy of
Israel asked him to curse Israel, in return for money. Balaam really wanted
to curse Israel and get the reward, but God wouldn't let him. Balak sent
a messenger to ask Balaam to come to him. Balaam asked God whether he
should go. The answer was that he should not go. Then the messenger came
again; and this time, God told Balaam to go with them, but only to speak
God's word. It was as if God was pushing Balaam down the road to spiritual
ruin. The end result of Balaam meeting Balak was that he advised Balak
to make Israel sin with his women, which would mean that God would curse
Israel. And for this Balaam was condemned. If Balaam had not gone with
the messengers in the first place, he would not have fallen into this
sin. But God told him to go with them (Num. 22:20).
The Lord’s words to Judas: “Do that for which thou art
come” (Mt. 26:50 RV) can surely be read as nothing else than confirming
a wicked man in the evil way he had chosen to take.
Israel: Prime Example
The principles which we have discussed are embodied in the experience
of Israel. All their history is recorded for the learning of the Christian
church of today, in their role as spiritual Israel (Rom. 15:4; 1 Cor.
10:11).
Abraham was called to leave Ur and travel to Canaan, the land promised
to him. If his heart had remained in his native land, God would have worked
in his life to make it possible for him to return to it, and thereby reject
God's covenant with him. The fact Abraham wasn't given this opportunity
indicates his faith (Heb. 11:15). This shows that God gives us the opportunity
to renounce our faith if that is what we want in our hearts (cp. Balaam).
The descendants of Jacob / Israel were not righteous, although they were
God's people. The law of Moses was given to them " because of transgressions"
(Gal. 3:19). And yet the very existence of the Mosaic Law generated sin,
and thereby the experience of God's wrath upon His people (Rom. 4:15).
So why were Israel given the Law? In some ways (and this isn't the only
reason) to confirm them in their sinfulness. The original Mosaic Law was
" holy, just and good" in itself (Rom. 7:12). But later, God
gave Israel " laws that were not good" (referring to
the Halachas of the Scribes?) so that they would go further away from
Him (Ez. 20:25). He must have done this by inspiring men to say things
which were genuinely communicated by God, but which were false. As men
turn away their ears (of their own volition) from the truth, so God will
turn their ears to fables (2 Tim. 4:4). If you turn away your ears from
truth, Paul says that you are turned unto what is untrue (2 Tim.
4:4). He doesn’t say that a person turns their ears away from truth and
then turns their ears to untruth. By turning away from truth, God confirms
the person in that- and He turns them towards untruth.
On their journey to Canaan, the Israelites worshipped idols. Because
of this, " God turned, and gave them up (over) to worship the host
of heaven...I gave them up to the hardness of their hearts" (Acts
7:42; Ps. 81:12 AVmg.). God reached a stage where He actually encouraged
Israel to worship idols; He confirmed them in their rejection of Him.
And throughout their history, He encouraged them in their idolatry (Ez.
20:39; Am. 4:4).
Israel were told to work with God to drive out the nations who lived
in Canaan, because if those people remained there, they would be a spiritual
temptation for Israel. But Israel sinned, they willfully followed the
idols of Canaan rather than the God of Israel. And therefore
God said that He would not help Israel in driving out the nations any
more (Jud. 2:20,21). It was as if He was confirming them in their desire
to succumb to the temptations of the surrounding nations.
Later on, Israel requested a human king. God was Israel's king, and therefore
their desire was effectively a rejection of God and Israel's special relationship
with Him. And yet God gave them a human king. If they had a human king,
it was harder for them to be God's Kingdom, to personally realize that
God was their King, that He was the one to whom they owed all allegiance
and duty. And yet God gave them a human king, because this was the path
they had chosen. 1 Sam. 12:14,15 states what is apparently obvious: "
If ye will fear the Lord, and serve Him (as your true king) and
obey His voice...then shall both ye and the king...continue following
the Lord...but if ye will not obey the voice of the Lord...then shall
the hand of the Lord be against you" . Surely this means that if
Israel kept on obeying God, He would help them to keep on obeying. But
if they disobeyed, He would be against them, with the implication that
this would result in them being even more disobedient.
The confirmation of Israel in their evil way was brought to its climax
in the crucifixion of Christ. The leaders of first century Israel initially
recognized Jesus of Nazareth as the Messiah (Mt. 21:38 cp. Gen. 37:20;
Jn. 7:28). They saw (i.e. understood, recognized) him, but then they were
made blind by Christ (Jn. 9:39). It was because they " saw"
Jesus as the Messiah that the sin of rejecting him was counted to them
(Jn. 9:41). This explains why the Roman / Italian nation was not held
guilty for crucifying Christ, although they did it, whereas the Jewish
nation was. And yet there is ample Biblical evidence to suggest that these
same people who " saw" / recognized Jesus as the Christ were
also ignorant of his Messiahship. " Ye both know me, and ye know
whence I am...Ye neither know me, nor my Father...when ye have lifted
up the Son of man, then shall ye know that I am he" (Jn.
7:28; 8:19,28) were all addressed to the same group of Jews. Did they
know / recognize Jesus as Messiah, or not? As they jeered at him on the
cross, and asked Pilate to change the nameplate from " Jesus, King
of the Jews" , did they see him as their Messiah? It seems to me
that they didn't. In ignorance the Jewish leaders and people crucified
their Messiah (Acts 3:17 RV). And yet they knew him for who he was, they
saw him coming as the heir. I would suggest the resolution to all this
is that they did recognize him first of all, but because they didn't want
to accept him, their eyes were blinded, so that they honestly thought
that he was an impostor, and therefore in ignorance they crucified him.
And yet, it must be noted, what they did in this ignorance, they
were seriously accountable for before God.
Practical Implications
If we accept the above thesis, we can better understand why God has allowed
His word to be written and translated in such a way as seems almost intended
to mislead. Likewise Ex. 16:20 says that the manna, symbolic of God's
word, " bred worms and stank" if it was not used properly. The
Scriptures, we are told, can be " wrested" by those who claim
to believe them, until the " unstable" 'believer' is destroyed
morally (2 Pet. 3:16). The only other occurrence of the Greek for "
unstable" is a few verses earlier (2 Pet. 2:14), where it is used
in a sexual context. The implication is that those 'believers' who want
to justify a deviant sexual lifestyle will find that they can " wrest"
the Scriptures to suite them, but in so doing they will be working out
their own destruction. This is the category who turn God's grace into
license for sexual sin (Jude 4). It would be interesting to know who gay
'Christians' think these warnings refer to, seeing they evidently think
they are not the subject of them. Thus Paul warns the Corinthians not
to be deceived by the idea that homosexuals would enter the Kingdom of
God; the implication was that there were homosexuals being wrongly tolerated
within the Corinthian church, who were justifying their behaviour as being
worthy of God's Kingdom (1 Cor. 6:9-11). The 'new wave' reinterpretation
of Bible texts in order to justify homosexuality is a clear example of
this. Sin, our very nature, is a deceiver (Heb. 3:13); hence the Bible
personifies our nature as a deceiver. " There is a way that seemeth
right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death" (Prov.
16:25).
There are other examples of the Bible purposefully giving scope for serious
misinterpretation. Thus God allowed " Gehenna" to be interpreted
rather than transferred as a proper noun; nephesh has so misleadingly
been translated " soul" in the AV, when all it usually means
is 'person', 'body' or 'being' (modern Bible versions render it like this).
Likewise, " satan" just means " adversary" ; and many
fanciful ideas would have been stillborn if this was how it had been translated.
All the passages quoted above clearly teach that God is the one
who deceives men who reject His Truth. He is the originator of both light
and darkness, goodness and disaster (Is. 45:5-7). This leaves no room
at all for the popular idea that 'satan' refers to an evil being responsible
for human deception and spiritual failure. The Biblical picture is that
moral and doctrinal apostacy is the result of man's very own nature and
the confirmation of God working in tandem.
There are whole verses whose translation in nearly all versions might
seem to hopelessly confuse the seeker for truth (e.g. " Today shalt
thou be with me in paradise" , or " When he cometh into the
world, he saith...a body hast thou prepared me" , Lk. 23:46; Heb.
10:5). Amazingly, these bad translations have never been a serious impediment
to even the most simple person who genuinely wants to find the Truth.
I find this nigh on a miracle. From this alone it seems clear that the
genuine seeker of Truth will always find it, but the Bible is written
in such a way, and its translation has been over-ruled in such a way,
as to deceive the insincere or uncalled reader into thinking that they
have found the Truth when actually they haven't.
It is often commented by some that doctrinal differences are not so important,
and that it is wrong to limit fellowship to only those who accept and
practice the basic doctrines which constitute the saving Gospel. The implication
of this attitude is that we should count ourselves as lucky if we have
the true doctrine of Christ, but not think that such differences affect
our standing before God. But the fact is, if you agree with the thesis
presented above, those who hold false doctrine have been deceived by God
into the doctrinal positions they are in, and their deception is a sign
of His displeasure with their 'hobbyist' approach to His word.
Of course, it isn't only apostate 'Christians' who are deceived by God.
Such deception can be frequently seen operating in the weak believer who
may apprehend perfectly every doctrinal aspect of the true Gospel- and
in some ways at some times, we're all weak. Bible reading is skipped,
prayer pushed into the background, meals gulped down with no further thought
for the Father who provides, self-examination never tackled... and yet
the brother or sister feels they have come to a higher spiritual level,
whereby as they understand it even from the Bible (e.g.) God
quite understands if we marry unbelievers, or (e.g.) they come to the
'realization' that actually friendship with the world, or total commitment
to our careers, is really serving God, or that really, doctrine doesn't
matter.... And so their real fellowship with God slips away, but they
are convinced that actually they are spiritually growing into
a higher relationship with God. God, working through their deceitful natures,
has deceived them. For this reason the Truth is in one sense the most
dangerous thing in the world. It can destroy us, blow us apart; God can
terribly, terribly deceive us, until at judgment day we gnash our teeth
in white hot rage against Him and ourselves (Is. 45:24).
God has written the Bible in such a way, whereby the majority of readers
are deceived by His way of writing into thinking that they have the Truth
when they don't. Once we appreciate this, the wonder of the fact
that we can have, in basic terms " the truth of the Gospel"
should really touch our hearts. " We know that we are of the truth,
and shall assure our hearts before him" (1 Jn. 3:19). " We know
that the Son of God is come, and hath given us an understanding, that
we may know him that is true, and we are in him that is true, even in
his Son Jesus Christ. This is the true God, and eternal life" (1
Jn. 5:20). The Truth of Christ is precious, very precious, it
is a tremendous privilege that we have been shown it, and therefore we
must search for it and then hold it like diamonds, study it, meditate
upon it, make it our life. For it will gloriously save us, or miserably
destroy us if we neglect it. " But we are not of them who are drawn
back (by God) unto perdition; but of them that believe toward the saving
of the soul" (Heb.10:39 Gk.).
References
(48) See The Upward Spiral
in James And Other Studies (London: Pioneer, 1992).
(49) A.P. Bell and M.S. Weinburg (op
cit.) found 20%: Cameron and Proctor found 17%: K. Cameron, P. Cameron
and K. Proctor, op cit.
(50) Bell and Weinburg, op cit. |