5-9 Reaching The Unreached
There can be no doubt that the emphasis in the life of Paul was
upon the geographical spread of the Gospel as far as possible. In
around ten years, he established ecclesias in the four provinces
of Galatia, Macedonia, Achaia and Asia. And then he speaks as if
his work was done in that part of the world, he had spread the word
from Jerusalem round to Illyricum [i.e. throughout the Eastern half
of the Empire], and therefore “I have no more place in these parts”
(Rom. 15:19,23). He speaks as if he has fulfilled the “line” or
geographical apportion of areas to him, and now he was turning his
attention to the Western side of the Roman empire, going to Rome,
planning a visit to Spain. In some ways, this is surprising, for
his letters indicate that the ecclesias he had already established
were weak indeed. All in Asia turned away from him, and he warned
the Ephesian elders of this. Ecclesias like Corinth were hopelessly
weak in doctrine and practice, and many were turning away, either
to the world, or back to Judaism as in the Galatian ecclesias.
He could so easily have spent his life running around the Eastern
half of the Roman empire, seeking to strengthen what remained. But
he seems to have considered his work to have been done, and presses
ahead with fresh witness in another part of the world. He wrote
letters and made occasional visits to address the problems as they
arose, but his stress was repeatedly on pushing forward with the
work.
This explains the speed with which he established ecclesias. He
stayed a few weeks or months in cities like Lystra and Thessalonica,
returning, in the case of Lystra, after 18 months, and then again
a few years later. He spent three consecutive sabbaths in Thessalonica
(Acts 17:2), baptized the converts, and then didn’t come back to
see them for about five and a half years (Acts 20:1,2). How were
they kept strong? By the good shepherd, by the grace of God, by
the Father and Son working with Paul. He seems to have drilled them
with the basics of the Gospel and the life they needed to live,
ordained immature elders who were literate and able to teach the
word, and then left them what he repeatedly calls “the tradition”,
a document or set of teachings relating to practical life in Christ
(1 Cor. 11:2,23; 2 Thess. 2:5; 3:6; 1 Tim. 6:20; 2 Tim. 1:13; 2:2;
3:14; Tit. 1:9) (4). It was perhaps
the simplicity and brevity of the message that was its strength
in the lives of the early converts. Their lives were based directly
upon reflection upon the implications of the basic elements of the
Gospel. It is today amazing how simple men and women remember and
reflect upon the things taught them even verbally, and show an impressive
appreciation of them when they are visited again after some months
or years. Interestingly, Corinth had the most evident problems and
immaturity, even though Paul spent 18 months there, whereas ecclesias
like Philippi which he established far quicker seem to have been
far sounder. It therefore follows that length of pastoral work is
not necessarily related to spiritual strength.
An insight into Paul’s attitude is revealed in the way he speaks
of how a door of preaching opportunity had been opened to him at
Ephesus (1 Cor. 16:9). Surely he is alluding to the Lord’s words
about knocking in prayer, and a door is opened. He had presumably
prayed for the opportunity to spread the word in Ephesus, and he
was given the positive answer. We likewise should be praying systematically
for the people in our lives, for unreached nations and peoples.
Yet the language of a door being opened sends us to Acts 14:27,
where the response of the Gentiles to Paul’s missionary work is
likewise spoken of as a door being opened- presumably, meaning that
here was an answer to prayer for response. A door was opened at
Troas, we assume also because of sustained prayer beforehand (2
Cor. 2:12). We must ask whether we really desire the Gospel to spread;
if we do, it will be reflected in our prayer life.
The disciples asked how the fig tree [cp. Israel] withered away
so quickly. The answer, of course, was in that Jesus had faith that
it would. He goes on to tell them that if they had faith,
the mountain of Zion, the hope of Israel, would be cast into the
sea of nations (Mt. 21:20,21). The Lord Jesus is surely saying that
His faith should not be seen as separate from our
faith. According to the faith of the disciples, the Hope of Israel,
rejected by the withered fig tree of Israel, could be spread to
the Gentiles. But the spread of the Gospel world-wide was and is
conditional upon our faith, modelled as it must be upon His example.
It was also the Lord’s desire that His word should be spread. The
neat maps in our Bibles notwithstanding, it is clear that Paul had
no such clear plan of where to found ecclesias. He preached in Galatia
because illness required that he spend some time there, against
his original intention (Gal. 4:13). He was forbidden to preach
in Bithynia as he had planned, he fled to Athens for safety and
ended up preaching there, then he fled from there to Corinth (Acts
16:6,7). And it seems that he was only in transit through Ephesus,
but found the people responsive and therefore continued working
there (Acts 18:19). Indeed, his movements were so uncertain that
he was open to the charge of vacillating about his plans (2 Cor.
1:15,18). And yet it has been shown (5)
that the places where Paul founded ecclesias were strategic points,
in that they were centres where different nationalities mixed, where
trade routes crossed, where social and religious conditions were
better than elsewhere for the spread of the Gospel. Yet this was
not due to any conscious desire of Paul for this; the Lord overruled
this, so that, e.g., from Thessalonica the message sounded out throughout
Asia, due to the many mobile people who heard the Gospel there.
Notes
(4) We perhaps need such a document
today especially in the mission field. Robert Roberts’ ‘The Commandments
Of Christ’ and the similar booklet by my dear wife Cindy could perhaps
be more widely translated and used.
(5) Roland Allen, Missionary
Methods (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1999 Ed.) ch. 2.
|