5.4 The Grace Of Jesus
The grace of Jesus and His Father, so great, so free, was a
challenge for even the Lord to express in any verbal medium. The way He
spoke was grace itself. He wept over the men of Jerusalem, sorrowing that
their destruction must come because " thou knewest not the time of
thy visitation" (Lk. 19:44). He could have quite well said: "
because you have rejected me..." . But His grace was greater than
to say that. The utter inappropriacy of our salvation is brought out time
and again in His teaching. The oil lamp with the bruised reed and smoking
flax which annoyingly filled the house with smoke was nurtured and tolerated
in hope by this Lord of ours. We in these last days are " the poor
and the maimed and the halt and the blind" who lay in the city streets
(Lk. 14:21). Yet we are invited and lead (the blind) or dragged / carried
(the lame) into the great supper. For those who deeply meditated, the
lame at the great man's table would have taken them back to lame Mephibosheth
at David's table. His response to the invitation was to bow;
think of a lame man bowing. How awkward it must have been, and how awkward
he must have felt. " I'm a dead dog, from a family who cruelly hated
you; why, why me?" was his response. And this ought to be ours. The
awkward bow of that lame man, however embarrassing it was to watch for
David in his glory, is a superb type of our attempts to respond to the
inexplicable grace we have received from the Lord. He knows our weakness.
Even though He taught plainly that 'the majority' (Gk; AV " many"
) of those He called would not be chosen, His parables often use percentages
which imply that two thirds (parable of the pounds) or half (parable of
the virgins) will respond. This shows the love that hopes, in
the face of the finest knowledge and foreknowledge of human nature which
any man has ever had.
A Penny A Day
The pureness of the grace of the Lord Jesus is hard to plumb. He knew
that the extent of His grace would cause others to stumble. The
element of unreality in the parable of the labourers shows this.
He hired the labourers no-one else wanted, the old and weak workers,
some of them only for an hour, and still gave them a day's pay.
They must have walked away from the pay table with their heads spinning,
scarcely daring to believe what they held in their hands- a matchless
picture of the response of the faithful after learning of their
acceptance at the day of judgment. But the outlook of those who
felt their salvation (the penny) was less by grace than the others
became bitter: " Is thine eye evil, because I am good?"
(Mt. 20:15). In saying this, the Lord was referring back to Dt.
15:9, which warned Israel not to have an evil eye towards their
poverty stricken brother (cp. the unwanted labourer) who asked for
a loan near the time of the year of release, when all debts were
cancelled. In the year of release, Israel were " to remit every
private debt...and not demand it of thy brother" (Dt.
15:2 LXX). This is behind Mt. 18:28, where Christ speaks of the
man who demands repayment from his brother. The Lord is implying:
You should live in the spirit of the year of release all the time,
giving without expecting. Lk. 6:35 has the year of release in mind,
in the idea of lending without expecting anything back. This only
happened in the year of release. " Is thine eye evil, because
I am good" is therefore saying that the Lord's grace towards
the poverty-stricken labourer had provoked an " evil eye"
in the others, they somehow felt that they were having to give to
him, that they were standing to lose by his acceptance. Yet, as
the Lord implies, this is a nonsense attitude. Of course we don't
stand to lose anything by another's acceptance! And it's possible
to reason that it was those 11th hour labourers represent
the accepted, whilst the complainers are rejected (" Go thy
way" has been read by some as meaning they were fired whilst
the others were taken on permanently (1)).
But with what superb accuracy does He get right inside the future
mentality of many in His ecclesia! How very very true this parable
has been time and again in the history of our community. Discussion
of and practice of the idea of grace has provoked untold bitterness
amongst those who feel they live less by grace.
The grace of Jesus framed the parable of the man going down from Jerusalem
to Jericho in terms of Zedekiah's flight from Jerusalem (2 Kings 25:4);
a man who had repeatedly spurned the offers God made to him through
Jeremiah, and who was attacked on that road by the Babylonians (cp. the
robbers). Yet the parable shows that Christ will graciously save
even a man like that; for according to the parable, Zedekiah represents
every one of us.
The Fanatic Shepherd
The element of unreality in the parables often brings out the grace of
Jesus the Lord. The farmer who hires weak, useless servants (those rejected
by other employers) and gives them a day's wages for an hour's work is
one clear example. And so too, if we think about it, is the Lord's story
of the shepherd who so madly loves his sheep, whose life is so taken up
by his job, that he would die to save one of them, and comes back triumphantly
rejoicing when he has found the lost sheep (Lk. 15:5). The average shepherd
would have surely accepted that some sheep are lost, it's the luck of
the game. But this shepherd who dropped all and ran off after one lost
sheep was no usual shepherd. And the element of unreality in the story
brings out the Lord's grace towards us. Note in passing how the man :
sheep relationship portrays that between us and Christ. As the sheep understood
pathetically little about the shepherd's sacrifice to save it, so we too
fail to appreciate the height of the fact that Christ died for us, as
the shepherd for the sheep. In this was the grace of Jesus.
The Unprofitable Servant
The story of the slave who worked all day in the field and was then expected
to come home and cook for his master without a word of thanks to him seems
to be more realistic, lacking this element of unreality. But the Greek
word " charis" , usually translated " grace" , is
the one used for " thank" here (Lk. 17:9). The point is that
we don't receive grace because of our going the extra mile, as we are
inclined to think. We receive grace, but not as a result of all our special
efforts; these are what are expected of us, on account of the fact that
we have become salves to our Master, the Lord Jesus. At the end of all
our special efforts (in whatever sphere), we must consciously make an
effort to recognize that we are " unprofitable servants" (Lk.
17:10). This must surely connect with Mt. 25:30, which describes the rejected
at the day of judgment as unprofitable servants. If we judge / condemn
ourselves, we will not be condemned (1 Cor. 11:31). This is just one of
many examples of where the Lord's parables seem intended to be linked
with each other- which further proves that they are not stories with a
deeper meaning, whose storyline is not intended to be carefully considered.
We must recognize not only that we are unprofitable servants, but that
we have only done what was our " duty" or debt to do- the implication
being that we were sold into slavery on account of an unpayable debt.
This is exactly the figure used by the Lord to describe us in Mt. 18:25.
But there is a telling detail in Lk. 17:10 which further reflects the
grace of Jesus: " When ye shall have done (not 'when you
do') all these things which are commanded you, (you will) say, We are
unprofitable servants" . It may be that this is taking us forward
to the Kingdom; it is at the judgment that we 'do all' (Eph. 6:13), it
is in the Kingdom that we will obey all the commandments (Ps. 119:6).
This parable is a glimpse into the appreciation of grace we will have
as we enter the Kingdom; once we are fully righteous, we will realize
how unprofitable we are of ourselves (notice we may still feel in a sense
" unprofitable" then). We will realize that all our service
is only the repaying of the huge debt incurred by our sinfulness. Then,
and perhaps only then, will we see works in their true perspective. This
surely is the purpose of the judgment seat. We will walk away with the
sense of wonder at the grace of Jesus that filled the one-hour workers
as they walked away from the pay table with a day's wages.
Our Inability To Recompense
Our inability to do any works in the sense of extra acts of
pleasure to God is brought out in the parable of the great supper. Christ
prefaced this with the command: " When thou makest a feast, call
the poor, the maimed, the lame, the blind...for they cannot recompense
thee; for thou shalt be recompensed at the resurrection of the just"
(Lk. 14:13,14). He then goes on to describe how the Father and Himself
put this into practice; in the invitation to the Kingdom, " the poor,
and the maimed, and the halt and the blind" (Lk. 14:21) are invited;
with the implication that Christ will be " recompensed at the resurrection
of the just" . We don't recompense Him now by our works; we are lost
sheep causing Him needless work and worry, wasting His goods and needing
to get ourselves out of the problem (Lk. 16:1), needing His frank forgiveness
for our huge debts (Mt. 18:24). As Job recognized, if we are righteous,
we give nothing to God (Job 35:7). Our unrighteousness commends
God's righteousness (Rom. 3:5). All things come out of God: "
Who hath first given to him? ...for of him, and through him, and to him,
are all things" (Rom. 11:35,36); it's give, give, give with God.
We are the poor beggars sitting down at the great supper, unable to recompense.
Of course, it depends where we put the emphasis. The parable which
relates how Christ desires fruit from us is followed by that of the marriage
supper, where it seems we are just asked to accept an invitation with
humility (Mt. 21:34; 22:3). The point surely is that we are invited, for
no reason, to the Kingdom, and we must accept with the humility that will
accompany a recognition of such grace (Lk. 14:9). But our experience of
this grace will inevitably bring forth some spiritual fruit.
Again, it seems we are intended to follow the story through, and visualize
the inappropriate, uncultured conduct of these beggars at the table, causing
so much unspoken embarrassment and pain to the generous rich man. The
link with Is. 55:1-3 would suggest that we can interpret the call to the
supper as the call of the Gospel, and the hungry people sitting down to
a fine meal as our ecclesial experience now (although this isn't to say
that we can't read it as concerning the future Kingdom too). The preceding
Lk. 14:8-11 describe us as sitting down at the feast in this life, until
the host walks in and starts re-arranging the seating order (cp. the coming
of Christ in judgment on His household). We are left to imagine the grabbing
for food, the greedy, selfish eyeing up of the plates, the grasping, the
lack of social skills, the lack of good conversation between each other,
the occasional cursing under the breath, perhaps even throwing of food,
the eager desire for wine, the lack of restraint. All in the company of
the Master (God) and His servants (Christ and the Angels). And this, it
seems to me, was the Lord's imagination of His immature ecclesia, feasting
on the good things He has prepared for us. Can we not begin to enter just
a little into the pain and acute embarrassment and sadness we cause to
our gracious Host by the self-centredness of our natures, manifest as
it is in spiritual terms so often? It's quite possible to become so spiritually
selfish, so bent on our own salvation, that the whole spirit of the supper
is lost. After all, the idea of a large supper is to inculcate a social
spirit rather than just to provide individual feeding to each of the guests.
How many times has it been reasoned in these last days: 'Sorry, I have
to work out my own salvation, I just can't spare time and can't risk association
with my weaker brethren...'. And the Lord Jesus, in His perfect way, saw
this coming as in sunny Galilee He formulated His parables of grace.
One example of the Lord Jesus' emphasis on our salvation being through
grace rather than our works is found in the way the parables teach that
our acceptance is to some degree dependent on our predestination. Thus
the parable of the types of ground suggests that we are good or bad ground
at the time the seed is first sown; the fish are good or bad at the time
they first enter the net; the wise virgins take the oil with them from
the start of their vigil. I would suggest that this is not just part of
the story. It was evidently within the Lord's ability to construct stories
which featured the idea of bad seed or fish etc. changing to good, and
vice versa. But He didn't; indeed, His emphasis seems to have been on
the idea of predestination. This isn't to decry the effort for spirituality
which we must make; but His stress of the predestination factor is surely
to remind us of the degree to which our calling and salvation is by pure
Through the grace of Jesus, He is in love with us; He has called us to
be His bride. He sees us in an extremely positive light. He counts us
as righteous to a degree that is a real struggle to believe- even during
His ministry, " when we were yet sinners" , and when the only
example He had of His bride were those faltering 12. He tells the Jews
that His people will fast and mourn for His absence after His departure,
with the intensity that the friends of the bridegroom would have if the
groom suddenly collapsed and died at the wedding (this seems to be the
picture of Mt. 9:15, seeing " taken away" as an idiom for sudden
death). This is surely a positive view of the sorrow of the body of Christ
for their Lord's absence. Even if we see in this mini-parable only a description
of the disciples' sorrow after the Lord's death, He is giving a
very positive description of the disciples' joy, saying that they didn't
fast for joy of being with Him; He describes their joy as the joy of the
friends of the groom at the wedding. Yet the Gospels paint the twelve
as a struggling, uncertain group of men, eaten up with the petty arguments
of this life, unused to the self-control of fasting. Peter, for example,
had until very recently been a possibly immoral young fisherman (1 Pet.
The happiness of the disciples is explained in terms of them being at
a wedding. The happiness of the wedding is normally associated with alcohol,
and the context of Mt. 9:15 goes on to explain that Christ's new covenant
is symbolised by new wine. The difference between John's disciples and
Christ's was that Christ's were full of the joy of the new covenant. But
there is ample reason to think that they were heavily influenced by Judaist
thinking; they didn't go and preach to the Gentile world as Christ commanded,
and even Peter was marvellously slow to realize the Jewish food laws had
been ended by Christ, despite the Lord's strong implication of this in
Mk. 7:19 (not AV). Yet the grace of Jesus saw His men as if they
had grasped the meaning of the new covenant, as if they had the
joy of true faith in and understanding of His work; and He spoke of them
to the world in these terms. We can take untold comfort from this; for
we dare to believe that the Lord does and will confess our name (character)
in a like exalted manner to the Father and His Angels.
Just before His death, in full knowledge of the disciples' impending
collapse of faith, the grace of Jesus confidently spoke of how His men
would not follow " a stranger...but will flee from him" (Jn.
10:5). But the disciples fled from their Lord in Gethsemane, as He knew
they would (from Zech. 13:7, cp. Mt. 26:31) at the time He said those
words. He knew that He must die for the sheep who would scatter each one
to His own way (Is. 53:6). " The time cometh...when ye shall be scattered,
every man to his own" (Jn. 16:32); and true enough, they all fled
from Him (Mt. 26:56). But in Jn. 10 He spoke of His followers as calm,
obedient sheep who would not scatter if they had a good shepherd (Jn.
10:12); even though He knew they would. The Lord's way of imputing such
righteousness to His followers seems to be brought out in Jn. 10:4 cp.
6: " The sheep follow Him (Christ): for they know (understand, appreciate)
His voice...this parable spake Jesus unto them: but they understood not
what things they were which he spake" , i.e. they didn't know
We are described as Christ's " own servants" , i.e. His special,
trusted, right-hand men (Mt. 25:14)- even the one talent man who did nothing
at all. He searches for the lost sheep until He finds it (Lk. 15:4)- as
if He positively assumed that surely all lost sheep will return. This
is surely a high view to have of us, higher, sadly, than we merit.
Christ And Israel
The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ is perhaps most clearly seen in His
attitude to Israel. So many of the parables refer in some way to
the love of God and Christ for Israel; and their love for rebellious,
indifferent Israel is the supreme example of pure grace (2).
He felt towards them as a hen for her chicks (Lk. 13:34). Here again
is an element of unreality; a hen whose very own chicks won't be
gathered under her wings. This seems to go right against nature;
the pain of the rejected parent was there in the experience of the
Lord. He wasn't just passively enduring the polemics of the Pharisees;
they were His chicks, He really wanted them under His wings (cp.
Israel dwelling under the wings of the cherubim). We must ever remember
this when we read the records of Him arguing with them and exposing
their hypocrisy. He wasn't just throwing back their questions, playing
the game and winning, just surviving from day to day with them.
He was trying to gather them, and their rejection of His words really
hurt Him. Their reproach broke His heart; He didn't just brazenly
endure it as we might the ravings of a drunken man (Ps. 69:20).
Lk. 13:7,8 teaches that after the three years of His ministry, during
Christ's final six months, God suggested to Christ that the nation of
Israel be cut down (this is but one example of the private intercourses
between Father and Son). The Lord knew when He must die soon; He had already
steadfastly set His face to go to die at Jerusalem (Lk. 9:51). It seems
to me that He knew He would be killed by the Jews in a few months time.
But He asks the Father to spare Israel for at least another year- as if
to show that He knew they wouldn't accept Him even after His death, but
He's saying to God: 'Give them a chance even after they kill me'. Those
who think further along the lines suggested by the parable will see that
in reality, Israel were not cut down by God for another 37 years. The
implication is that this was due to Christ's pleading with God during
those years for patience to be shown to the nation who rejected
and crucified Him. The element of unreality in the story reflects
the grace of Jesus- for it was unthinkable for a servant to argue back
with his master, asking not to do what he had been ordered to do.
The Lord so respected Israel that He felt giving the Gospel to the Gentiles
instead of them was like casting good food to dogs (Mk. 7:27). Israel
(the children) didn't want to eat, but the Lord painted them as if they
did. The " crumb" that was cast to the dogs was a great miracle;
but Christ saw that as only a crumb of the huge meal that was prepared
for Israel. It seems the idea here is meant to be connected with His invitation
to us to sit at table with Him and share the meal, both now (Lk. 14:8)
and in the Kingdom (Lk. 12:37). Just one crumb of the Lord's meal is a
mighty miracle, and yet we are asked to sit down and eat the whole meal
with Him: as symbolised in our eating of " the Lord's supper"
. This is an eloquent picture of the greatness of our position as members
of His table now, as well as in the future.
The Enthusiastic Lord
This enthusiasm for Israel's response to the Gospel comes out again when
the grace of Jesus likens Himself to a street kid in the market who really
wanted to get a game going with the other kids. He offered to play funerals
with them (through His appeal through John the Baptist), but they refused.
He then offered to play weddings (through His Gospel of grace, joy and
peace), but still they refused (Lk. 7:32). By all means connect this with
another market place parable, where Christ (the servant) comes there to
try to recruit labourers, on almost unbelievably good rates. The Lord's
enthusiasm for the salvation of first century Israel (and us too) comes
out in Lk. 14:5 RSV, where He likens the urgency of His mission
to that of a man whose son has fallen down a well. He simply must
get there, regardless of the Sabbath rules. And this, says the Lord, is
His all out urgency to save men. We have all fallen down the pit from
whence we must be rescued (Zech. 9:11). As we distribute leaflets, place
our adverts, talk to our contacts, strive in our own character development
towards salvation; this is the verve of the Lord Jesus to save us. It
is only the hardness of the human heart that can stand in the way of the
mighty enthusiasm of the Son of God for our redemption. Hence the sense
of hurt, sadness and frustration to the Master when men refuse His efforts,
as typified in the story of the wonderful banquet that was inexplicably
spurned by the intended guests (Lk. 14:16). In passing, note the connection
of pulling a man out of a pit with Joseph and Jeremiah, types of the Lord's
resurrection (cp. Ps. 40:2). When a man is pulled out of the pit at baptism,
he is sharing the experience of the resurrected Lord. And the Lord is
naturally so urgent that men should share that experience which He suffered
so much for.
This enthusiasm, this closeness to us, comes out in Christ's description
of Himself as 'taking a far journey' away from us to Heaven. The Greek
strictly means 'to leave one's own native people to go abroad'; with the
implication that the Lord feels closer towards us that the Angels. This
is exactly the line of argument of Hebrews 1 and 2: Christ didn't come
to save Angels, He came to save us, therefore He had exactly our nature
and feelings, not theirs. He is closely watching our spiritual growth,
as the farmer watches the wheat and then immediately begins to
harvest it once the humidity and growth is just right (Mk. 4:29). This
is the enthusiasm with which the Lord watches our growth, not just individually,
but as a community, i.e. the whole field. As the growth is still in some
sense a mystery to the farmer, so it may be to Christ (Mk. 4:26,27); we
grow, " he knoweth not how" . This could be taken as an eloquent
essay in the Lord's own limitation of knowledge.
Finally. The Lord's zeal for our redemption and His enthusiasm to see
us as righteous is brought out in the parable of the prodigal. The Father
(manifest in the Lord) runs out to meet the son. That story was masterfully
tied back in to Is. 64:5-8: " Thou meetest him that rejoiceth and
worketh righteousness, those that remember thee in thy ways...we have
sinned...we are all as an unclean thing, and all our righteousnesses are
as filthy rags...but now, O Lord, thou art our father" . The patient,
hopeful father saw in the son a boy rejoicing and working righteousness;
but this was hardly how he felt! And so it will be with Israel
in the last days. And so it is with each of us now, in our times of repentance.
That surpassing grace is ours; we are seen as working righteousness when
all we have is a bitter self-loathing and desire to somehow get back to
God. But the crucial point is: how often do we have such a true
repentance? We repeatedly sin, that we admit. But how frequently is there
this kind of repentance which calls forth such grace, to see us as so
righteous when we are so unrighteous, the grace of Jesus so great, so
(1) This is the line of
interpretation followed by H.A. Whittaker in his treatment of this
parable in Studies In The Gospels (Wigan: Biblia, 1984).
(2) This point is repeatedly
made, with overflowing evidence, throughout H.A. Whittaker ibid
and John Carter, Parables Of The Messiah (Birmingham: CMPA,